Discussion here.
Editor
David Boonin (Colorado)Advisory Board
Felicia Nimue Ackerman (Brown)
Neera Badhwar (Oklahoma)
Francis Beckwith (Baylor)
David Benatar (Cape Town)
Elizabeth Brake (Arizona State)
John Corvino (Wayne State)
Robert George (Princeton)
Lori Gruen (Wesleyan)
Dale Jamieson (NYU)
Christopher Kaczor (Loyola Marymount)
Eva Feder Kittay (Stony Brook)
Eric Mack (Tulane)
Elinor Mason (Edinburgh)
Jan Narveson (Waterloo)
Tommie Shelby (Harvard)
Nancy Sherman (Georgetown)
Saul Smilansky (Haifa)
Bonnie Steinbock (SUNY Albany)
Heather Widdows (Birmingham)Partner Journals
note for contributors
Information about submitting material to What's Wrong? can be found here.search this site
-
follow us on facebook
As someone with two tattoos, I find this very compelling. I like Adam Suerte’s approach to this sensitive subject. He’s the one who stated that he will warn his customers of the risks of the potential tattoo (like breakups), but at the end of the day, if the customers want the tattoo, he’ll make it a tattoo that will be easy to cover up in the future. By attempting to dissuade his client, he’s done his job of providing his professional opinion. In a way, it’s better that he doesn’t turn them away to another artist, because at least Suerte is able to make the tattoo in a color that can be covered up. If they went somewhere else, that artist may have done it in a way that would be irreversible. I do believe that artists have the right to refuse anyone, but in Suerte’s case, he did the right thing by tattooing the thing he didn’t necessarily agree with.
LikeLike